timtyler comments on Muehlhauser-Goertzel Dialogue, Part 2 - Less Wrong

9 Post author: lukeprog 05 May 2012 12:21AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: timtyler 06 May 2012 01:26:52AM 0 points [-]

About optimization -- I think it’s rather naive and narrow-minded to view hypothetical superhuman superminds as “optimization powers.” It’s a bit like a dog viewing a human as an “eating and mating power.” Sure, there’s some accuracy to that perspective -- we do eat and mate, and some of our behaviors may be understood based on this. On the other hand, a lot of our behaviors are not very well understood in terms of these, or any dog-level concepts.

What's optimised is fitness. However, humans are complex symbiotic unions which include gut bacteria, parasites, foodstuffs and meme-based entities - so there are multiple conflicting optimisation targets involved with humans.

Superintelligences will be all-memes. These may have aligned interests - or they may not. In the former case the "optimisation" model of an agent would make good sense.