Hul-Gil comments on Thoughts on the Singularity Institute (SI) - Less Wrong

256 Post author: HoldenKarnofsky 11 May 2012 04:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1270)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 11 May 2012 05:39:52AM *  4 points [-]

It seems like everyone is talking about SL4; here is a link to what Richard was probably complaining about:

http://www.sl4.org/archive/0608/15895.html

Comment author: Hul-Gil 11 May 2012 07:24:24AM *  8 points [-]

Thanks. I read the whole debate, or as much of it as is there; I've prepared a short summary to post tomorrow if anyone is interested in knowing what really went on ("as according to Hul-Gil", anyway) without having to hack their way through that thread-jungle themselves.

(Summary of summary: Loosemore really does know what he's talking about - mostly - but he also appears somewhat dishonest, or at least extremely imprecise in his communication.)

Comment author: [deleted] 11 May 2012 04:49:52PM 3 points [-]

Please do post it, I think it would help resolve the arguments in this thread.