= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
thomblake comments on Thoughts on the Singularity Institute (SI) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (1270)
To those who think Eliezer is exaggerating: please link me to "informed criticism of SIAI."
It is so hard to find good critics.
Edit: Well, I guess there are more than two examples, though relatively few. I was wrong to suggest otherwise. Much of this has to do with the fact that SI hasn't been very clear about many of its positions and arguments: see Beckstead's comment and Hallquist's followup.
I'm not sure how much he's put into writing, but Ben Goertzel is surely informed. One might argue he comes to the wrong conclusions about AI danger, but it's not from not thinking about it.