paper-machine comments on Thoughts on the Singularity Institute (SI) - Less Wrong

256 Post author: HoldenKarnofsky 11 May 2012 04:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1270)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 May 2012 01:25:50AM *  9 points [-]

As far as I can tell, the vast majority of academic projects (particularly those of undergrads) have worked on narrow AI, which this is supposedly not.

However, reading the post again, it doesn't sound as though they have the support of any academic institution; I misread the bit around "academic network". It sounds more as though this is a homebrew project, in which case I need to go two or three orders of magnitude lower.

Comment author: othercriteria 17 May 2012 02:46:42AM 1 point [-]

As far as I can tell, the vast majority of academic projects (particularly those of undergrads) have worked on narrow AI, which this is supposedly not.

That's definitely a reasonable assessment. I dialed all those estimates down by about an order of magnitude from when I started writing that point as I thought through just how unusual attempting general AI is. But over sixty years and hundreds of institutions where one might get a sufficiently solid background in CS to implement something big, there are going to be lots of unusual people trying things out.