gwern comments on Thoughts on the Singularity Institute (SI) - Less Wrong

256 Post author: HoldenKarnofsky 11 May 2012 04:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1270)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 17 May 2012 01:38:24AM *  3 points [-]
  • Q. How can I find the priors for a problem?
  • A. Many commonly used priors are listed in the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics.

  • Q. Where do priors originally come from?

  • A. Never ask that question.

  • Q. Uh huh. Then where do scientists get their priors?

  • A. Priors for scientific problems are established by annual vote of the AAAS. In recent years the vote has become fractious and controversial, with widespread acrimony, factional polarization, and several outright assassinations. This may be a front for infighting within the Bayes Council, or it may be that the disputants have too much spare time. No one is really sure.

  • Q. I see. And where does everyone else get their priors?

  • A. They download their priors from Kazaa.

  • Q. What if the priors I want aren't available on Kazaa?

  • A. There's a small, cluttered antique shop in a back alley of San Francisco's Chinatown. Don't ask about the bronze rat.

http://yudkowsky.net/rational/bayes

Comment author: TimS 17 May 2012 01:55:16AM *  -1 points [-]

Isn't the lesson of the Quantum Physics sequence that ordinary humans today should get their priors from the least complex (and falsifiable?) statements that aren't inconsistent with empirical knowledge.