= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
private_messaging comments on Thoughts on the Singularity Institute (SI) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (1270)
nah, I stated that probability of him creating AGI is epsilon (my probability for his project hurting me is microscopic epsilon while the SI hurting him somehow is a larger epsilon, I only stated a relation that the latter is larger than former. The probability of a person going unfriendly is way, way higher than the probability of a person creating AGI that kills us all).
I think we're all here for various sarcastic or semi sarcastic points; my point is that given the SI stance, AGI researchers would (and have to) try to keep away from SI, especially those whom have some probability of creating an AGI, given combination of probability of useful contribution by SI versus probability of SI going nuts.
I never thought you disagreed with:
I actually meant that I thought you disagreed with:
Sorry for the language ambiguity. If you think the probability of SI hurting FinalState is epsilon, I misunderstood you. I thought you thought it was a large enough probability to be worth worrying about and warning FinalState about.