Vaniver comments on Thoughts on the Singularity Institute (SI) - Less Wrong

256 Post author: HoldenKarnofsky 11 May 2012 04:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1270)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 20 May 2012 06:16:16PM 0 points [-]

sends a signal of weakness and defensiveness to people not bent on a zealous quest for truth and self-improvement.

I do not see why this should be a motivating factor for SI; to my knowledge, they advertise primarily to people who would endorse a zealous quest for truth and self-improvement.

Comment author: Polymeron 20 May 2012 06:25:30PM 2 points [-]

That subset of humanity holds considerably less power, influence and visibility than its counterpart; resources that could be directed to AI research and for the most part aren't. Or in three words: Other people matter. Assuming otherwise would be a huge mistake.

I took Wei_Dai's remarks to mean that Luke's response is public, and so can reach the broader public sooner or later; and when examined in a broader context, that it gives off the wrong signal. My response was that this was largely irrelevant, not because other people don't matter, but because of other factors outweighing this.