= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
JoshuaZ comments on Thoughts on the Singularity Institute (SI) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (1270)
Why do you think this is the case? Is this just because the overall knowledge level concerning AI goes up over time? If so, what makes you think that that rate of increase is anything large enough to be significant?
Yes. This is just the way of invention in general: steady incremental evolutionary progress.
A big well funded team can throw more computational resources into their particular solution for the problem, but the returns are sublinear (for any one particular solution) even without moore's law.