Luke_A_Somers comments on How many people here agree with Holden? [Actually, who agrees with Holden?] - Less Wrong

4 Post author: private_messaging 14 May 2012 11:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (105)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 14 May 2012 02:00:46PM 1 point [-]

On that, I'm pretty sure that the SI would not rush that way. Consider the parable of the dragon. This isn't the story of someone who's willing to cut corners, but of someone who accepts that delays for checking, even delays that cause people to die, are necessary.

Plus, if they develop a clear enough architecture, so one can query what the AI is thinking, then one would be able to see potential future failures while still in testing, without having to have those contingencies actually occur. That will be one of the keys, I think. Make the AI's reasons something that we can follow, even if we couldn't generate those arguments on a reasonable time-frame.