= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
CuSithBell comments on How many people here agree with Holden? [Actually, who agrees with Holden?] - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (105)
Possibly it's upvoted to encourage responses to the post - that is, it's high-content relative to not posting?
There's been a feature request around for a while, to allow voting on non-existent comments, which if implemented could balance that out.
Before you posted this, I precommitted to upvote it if you didn't post it, if I predicted you'd upvote this post if you did post. I think?
I guess I'm not very good at acausal/counterfactual blackmail.
The problem may be more connected to limited stack size than anything else.
Hey!
Yeah, for some reason those never show up on my browser.
Is this meant as a joke? My first thought was that this was a joke, but it then occurred to me that having an efficient way of precommitting to upvoting certain types of comment when they appear wouldn't be so bad.
Actually, it was marked as Wontfix.
It's sort of a joke. I don't see any way of implementing the feature, but the rationale is sound.