Jack comments on [LINK] International variation in IQ – the role of parasites - Less Wrong

5 Post author: David_Gerard 14 May 2012 12:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: billswift 14 May 2012 01:04:03PM *  10 points [-]

From a response to a different attack on Lynn and Vanhanen:

Right. As I pointed out in my VDARE.com review in 2002, Lynn and Vanhanen's finding of an average IQ of 70 in black Africa is strong evidence in favor of the nurture position that a better environment can raise IQs, because African Americans, who appear to be about 4/5th black, score 15 points higher.

. . .

Moreover, there are still some low-hanging fruits where 3rd World countries would benefit from public health programs that succeeded in the U.S. in the first half of the 20th Century in boosting IQ directly or or in boosting mental energy. Fortifying salt with iodine eliminated the medical syndrome cretinism. while fortifying wheat with iron also eliminated an IQ-sapping medical condition. The Rockefeller Foundation's war on hookwarm greatly benefited the physical and economic energy of Southerners by ridding them of a parasite.

Comment author: Jack 14 May 2012 05:45:39PM 4 points [-]

Also note that there is at least one plausible candidate for a nurture variable among African Americans in low breast-feeding rates.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 May 2012 08:51:48PM 2 points [-]

IIRC, breast-feeding rates were plummeting in Europe in the late 20th century, but there was no substantial decline in IQ as far as I know.

Comment author: gwern 18 May 2012 07:51:50AM 3 points [-]

The Flynn effect has been stopping in Europe in past decades, to name one observation.