shminux comments on I Stand by the Sequences - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Grognor 15 May 2012 10:21AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (248)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 15 May 2012 06:08:15PM 1 point [-]

EY says:

So is the 747 made of something other than quarks? No, you're just modeling it with representational elements that do not have a one-to-one correspondence with the quarks of the 747. The map is not the territory.

To me it is an irrelevant accident that physical objects, unlike informational objects, happen to be reducible to quarks. After all, if you accept the possibility that we live in a simulation, I see no reason other than laziness to use the same substrate for different entities. But I agree that the best examples come from "computationalism": the same FAT file system can be implemented in multiple ways, some reducible to magnetic domains on a floppy disk, others only to the API calls from a sandboxed virtual machine.

Comment author: Thomas 15 May 2012 08:53:38PM -1 points [-]

So is the 747 made of something other than quarks?

Not entirely. Electrons are not of quarks. You can't have a 747 made from quarks only. [Nitpicking.]

Comment author: shminux 15 May 2012 09:06:04PM 2 points [-]

I'm guessing that this reply is to the EY's original post and is here by mistake.

Comment author: Thomas 15 May 2012 09:19:48PM 0 points [-]

In fact it is. But let it stay here.