CasioTheSane comments on How to brainstorm effectively - Less Wrong

43 Post author: PECOS-9 19 May 2012 09:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: CasioTheSane 23 May 2012 04:19:32PM *  0 points [-]

If I'm understanding correctly, this method is for randomly finding "creative ideas" but contains no way to direct those ideas towards solving any specific problem?

I usually consider creativity useful only when I can target it towards something I consider a worthwhile problem. Trying to realize a random creative idea would distract me from focusing my efforts on problems I've already found to be most important to work on.

Still, this does sound like it has potential- the more people using this, the chances that somebody would think of something related to a problem I am personally trying to solve would become higher.

Comment author: PECOS-9 23 May 2012 04:48:27PM *  2 points [-]

You can direct the method toward a specific problem by choosing provocations related to the problem area.

I've added a paragraph to the Provocation section just now to clarify this:

If you are trying to solve a specific problem or innovate in a particular domain, then choose provocations related to the domain. That is, if you're trying to figure out how to improve wikipedia, don't use a provocation like "Po, the orange juice has me for breakfast," choose one like "Po, citations are not needed" (escape) or "Po, articles contain encyclopedias." (reversal).

Comment author: CasioTheSane 25 May 2012 01:50:33AM 0 points [-]

Thanks, that's a critical point that makes the technique far more useful.