loup-vaillant comments on How to deal with non-realism? - Less Wrong

12 Post author: loup-vaillant 22 May 2012 01:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (168)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 24 May 2012 01:49:27PM 1 point [-]

Given your understanding of quantum mechanics, is your identity in this sense preserved from year to year today?
If it weren't, would you care?

Comment author: loup-vaillant 24 May 2012 09:33:16PM 1 point [-]

I'm not sure that's a meaningful question. I undoubtedly change from year to year, so… But there is some kind of continuity, which I'm afraid could be broken by a change of substrate. (But then again, we could change my substrate bit by bit…

If it weren't, I would not care, because it wouldn't break anything I value. If preservation of identity doesn't even happen currently in our mundane world, I would be stupid to value it. And I'll happily upload, then (modulo the mundane risk of being badly emulated of course).

But first, I must be convinced that either identity wasn't preserved in the first place, or that uploading preserves identity, or that I was just confused because the world actually works like… who knows.

Comment author: Logos01 29 May 2012 05:29:25PM 0 points [-]

A change of substrate occurs daily for you. It's just of a similar class. What beyond simple "yuck factor" gives you cause to believe that a transition from cells to silicon would impact your identity? That it would look different?

Comment author: loup-vaillant 30 May 2012 01:20:44PM 1 point [-]

No, it doesn't. You could argue that there's a renewal of atoms (most notably water), but swapping water atoms doesn't have physical meaning, so… No. Heck, even cut&paste transportation doesn't change substrate.

The "yuck factor" I feel cause me to doubt this: If an EM of me would be created during my sleep, what probability would I assign to wake up as silicon, or as wetware? I'm totally not sure I can say 1/2.

Comment author: Logos01 01 June 2012 05:42:30PM 0 points [-]

Actually it's more complicated than that. Not just water atoms; over time your genetic pattern changes -- the composition of cancerous to non-cancerous cells; the composition of senescent to non-senescent cells; the physical structures of the brain itself change.

Neurogenesis does occur in adults -- so not even on a cellular level is your brain the same today as it was yesterday.

Furthermore -- what makes you confident you are not already in a Matrix? I have no such belief, myself. Too implausible to believe we are in the parent of all universes given physics simulations work.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 02 June 2012 01:33:15AM 1 point [-]

over time your genetic pattern changes -- the composition of cancerous to non-cancerous cells; the composition of senescent to non-senescent cells

Note that neither of these developments are generally considered good.

Comment author: Logos01 02 June 2012 02:31:10AM 0 points [-]

Indeed. But they do demonstrate the principle in question.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 02 June 2012 02:46:56AM *  1 point [-]

The principal you're trying to demonstrate is that one shouldn't fear changing one's substrate since it's already happening. So, no they don't.