komponisto comments on [SEQ RERUN] The Rhythm of Disagreement - Less Wrong

2 Post author: MinibearRex 24 May 2012 01:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (9)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: komponisto 24 May 2012 05:43:26AM 2 points [-]

On the other hand, if, hypothetically, Scott Aaronson should say, "Eliezer, your question about why 'energy' in the Hamiltonian and 'energy' in General Relativity are the same quantity, is complete nonsense, it doesn't even have an answer, I can't explain why because you know too little," I would be like "Okay."

This is one of a number of comments by Eliezer from that era that seem to imply that he thought Scott Aaronson was a physicist. I don't know exactly what gave him that impression (it presumably has something to do with the fact that Scott studies quantum computing), but (just to make it explicit for the record) it is false. As I'm sure Eliezer knows by now, Scott Aaronson is a theoretical computer scientist. He knows a lot more (one presumes) about P and NP than about general relativity. (In fact, the cultural difference that exists between him and physicists is one of the classic themes of his blog.)

Comment author: DanArmak 26 May 2012 11:54:13AM 0 points [-]

Scott Aaronson is repaying the favor by referring people to Yudkowsky's writings on FAI and calling him an "AI visionary".

Comment author: wedrifid 26 May 2012 02:11:55PM 2 points [-]

Scott Aaronson is repaying the favor by referring people to Yudkowsky's writings on FAI and calling him an "AI visionary".

It took me a while to realize that in the context this resolves to what seems to constitute a clever insult.

Comment author: DanArmak 26 May 2012 05:38:26PM 0 points [-]

I was mostly just being snarky, but Eliezer is more famous as a rationality blogger and fanfiction author than an AI researcher.