= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
John_Maxwell_IV comments on A Scholarly AI Risk Wiki - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (56)
I would guess that the primary factors related to whether wikis succeed or fail don't have much to do with whether they are about AI risk or some other topic. So, perhaps beware of extrapolating too much from the FHI wiki data point.
As I said: it's absolutely essential that we get people involved who know how to run a wiki, keep people involved, and keep it up to date.
I'm unfortunately not one of these types of people.