army1987 comments on A Protocol for Optimizing Affection - Less Wrong

30 [deleted] 30 May 2012 12:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (114)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 May 2012 10:41:05AM *  6 points [-]

EDIT: on second thought, I switched the sex to the more likely case.

But on reading “him” (I hadn't read the previous version) I thought you were only talking about men, which also confused me. (I tend to overcompensate those things by only using gendered words for 1. specific individuals or 2. generic people for whom it wouldn't even make sense to be female, say, “a patrilinear ancestor”, and using gender-neutral words such as “people” or “them” even for reference classes of which 99% of members are male.)

Comment author: [deleted] 30 May 2012 10:53:32PM 1 point [-]

malglico

I hate english.

Comment author: Alex_Altair 09 June 2012 04:21:39AM 0 points [-]

mi go'i