Strange7 comments on Rational Toothpaste: A Case Study - Less Wrong

68 Post author: badger 31 May 2012 12:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (58)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: handoflixue 02 June 2012 12:07:53AM 3 points [-]

p(Dentist does this) * p(Dentist gets caught when doing this) = number of police reports on the subject. I'd expect this to be the sort of thing the media would have a ton of fun with, and I don't recall ever seeing a news report on this subject, so I'd assume # of police reports is very low.

Either this is an amazingly easy crime to get away with, or not many dentists do it. By default, I'd favor the latter theory by a wide margin, but I'll concede I'm uneducated on how hard it would be to detect something like this (at a minimum, if another dentist can notice these "starter holes" then simply getting a second opinion would reveal the fraud. The alternate is to assume a national dental conspiracy...)

Comment author: Strange7 04 June 2012 11:03:20AM 0 points [-]

"Starter holes," really? Think for five minutes. Dental health is invisibly reinforced or ruined by saliva chemistry, which a competent-yet-malicious professional could sabotage in ways most laymen - even a professional investigator such as a police office - would be oblivious to. http://ua.johntynes.com/content_comments.php?id=P3105_0_3_0

Comment author: handoflixue 04 June 2012 07:55:58PM 1 point [-]

I'm not worried about laymen catching it - I'm worried about other dentists noticing. "Second opinion" and all that.

Mostly, I'd assume (but could well be wrong) that the consequences are worse for a dentist than for, say, an auto-mechanic, so there's more incentive for a dentist to be honest.