= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
wedrifid comments on How can I argue without people online and not come out feeling bad? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (29)
[citation needed]
I've changed my mind arguing online, and so have plenty of others I know.
Rhetorical Use Of "[citation needed]" Considered Harmful. (By me.)
Given that your response refers to evidence that is more than sufficient to flat out invalidate the excessively general claim in question a citation wouldn't even help, never mind 'be necessary' - it'd just make the source cited look bad too.
One of many preferred alternatives to "[citation needed]" in such cases is "No, that's bullshit!"
(I like citations. I like asking for citations. I sometimes accept demands for citations to be appropriate. I would like citation requests to be statements that make it likely for citations to be provided when they are useful. This makes usages as a rhetorical device my enemy.)