shminux comments on Natural Laws Are Descriptions, not Rules - Less Wrong

32 Post author: pragmatist 08 August 2012 04:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (234)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 August 2012 08:23:25PM 1 point [-]

It's a reasonable question, if your intuition comes from engines and muscles, where every intentionally applied force must have a power source.

My point is that if you ask an incoherent question (i.e., think of gravity as an agent) you're bound to get an incoherent answer.

But few physics departments with decent instructors. And, as you well know, good scientists are not necessarily good teachers.

At the rate at which the number of countries with apparently no good physics teachers is expanding, given the other comments in this thread, there will be nowhere to study physics on Earth by tomorrow.

Comment author: shminux 08 August 2012 09:05:19PM *  3 points [-]

My point is that if you ask an incoherent question (i.e., think of gravity as an agent) you're bound to get an incoherent answer.

I disagree with the "bound" part. A competent and patient teacher would attempt to identify and explore the issue you are really struggling with, not the surface question that is being asked.