RichardKennaway comments on Natural Laws Are Descriptions, not Rules - Less Wrong

32 Post author: pragmatist 08 August 2012 04:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (234)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 09 August 2012 09:37:53AM 1 point [-]

Now nobody thinks, "The lawfulness of quantum field theory needs grounding

Isn't that exactly what hidden-variable theories try to do? There have been a lot of people dissatisfied with the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, and have sought something more fundamental to explain the probabilities.

Comment author: pragmatist 09 August 2012 10:13:19AM *  0 points [-]

Hidden variable theories are not an attempt to ground the lawfulness of quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger equation isn't reduced to something deeper in Bohmian mechanics. It appears as a basic unexplained law in the theory, just as it does in orthodox interpretations of QM. The motivation behind hidden variable theories is to repair purported conceptual defects in standard presentations of QM, not to account for the existence of the laws of QM.

I do think my claim is wrong, though. People do ask what grounds quantum field theory. In fact, that's a pretty common question. But that's mainly because people now realize that our QFTs are only effective theories, valid above a certain length scale. So the question is motivated by pretty much the same sort of reductionist viewpoint that leads people to question how the lawfulness of the Second Law is grounded.