= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Bruno_Coelho comments on Natural Laws Are Descriptions, not Rules - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (234)
Everyone who says 'metaphysics' could explain the same thing without saying. Mostly talk about ontology are extremely social prone, with explain the overall skepticism present here.
Metaphysics as the generally accepted paintbrush handle is not a natural, nor well-formed thingspace cluster, that is correct.
However, while Physics are about the world of causal interactions that we call the territory, there are things like cosmology that heavily rests on belief in the implied invisible w.r.t. the cosmological horizon. There are also things like speculating why the universe has simple mathematical descriptions, how to apply the anthropic principle to multiverses and so on and forth.
All of those I would consider less physics and more maths.