= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Grognor comments on Ask an experimental physicist - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (294)
You could go with what Everett wanted to call it in the first place, the relative state interpretation.
To answer your "Edit" question, no, the relative state interpretation does not include probabilities as fundamental.
Thanks! Getting back to original sources has always been good for me. Is that "Relative state" formulation of quantum mechanics?