pengvado comments on Ask an experimental physicist - Less Wrong

35 Post author: RolfAndreassen 08 June 2012 11:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (294)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pengvado 12 June 2012 02:49:40PM 2 points [-]

I am interested in whether the optimal solution involves light-speed (or asymptotically light-speed) expansion, or (for entropy or other considerations) does not actually end up eating the whole light cone.

The form of the expansion has very little to do with the form of the computronium.

Launch von Neumann probes at c-ε. They can be tiny, so the energy cost to accelerate them is negligible compared to the energy you can harvest from a new star system. When one arrives, it builds a few more probes and launches them at further stars, then turns all the local matter into computers. The computers themselves don't need to move quickly, since the probes do all the long-distance colonization.

Comment author: DanielVarga 12 June 2012 03:13:31PM 0 points [-]

You are right. Originally I became interested in purely photon-based computation because I had an even more speculative idea that seemed to require it. If you have a system that terraforms everything in its path and expands with exactly the speed of light, then you are basically unavailable to outside observation. You can probably see where this line of thought leads. I am aware of the obvious counterargument, but as I explained there, it is a bit weaker than it first appears.