Konkvistador comments on Poly marriage? - Less Wrong

-9 Post author: h-H 06 June 2012 07:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (127)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CuSithBell 07 June 2012 06:11:28PM 1 point [-]

I don't care what other people are convinced.

When you said above that status was the real reason LW-associates oppose legal polygamy, you were implying that these people are not actually convinced of these issues, or only pretend to care about them for status reasons.

I'm in a happy polygamous relationship and I know I'm not the only one.

Certainly! I'd like to clarify that I don't think polyamory is intrinsically oppressive, and that I am on the whole pretty darn progressive (philosophically) regarding sexual / relationship rights etc. (That is, I think it probably ideally should be legal. There are probably additional political concerns but politics makes me ill.) I think it's kinda weird that government is in the marriage business to begin with, but probably it is useful to have some sort of structure for dealing with the related tax / property / etc. concerns. I think that polygamy does occur in some cultures that are oppressive towards women, but I don't really have a notion of how much a part of that oppression it facilitates, and I don't necessarily think that's a legitimate factor in whether to legalize the institution. I'm on your side philosophically / politically.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 June 2012 06:13:18PM *  6 points [-]

When you said above that status was the real reason LW-associates oppose legal polygamy, you were implying that these people are not actually convinced of these issues, or only pretend to care about them for status reasons.

If polygamous people where high status they wouldn't voice nor perhaps even think of these objections.

I think it's kinda weird that government is in the marriage business to begin with, but probably it is useful to have some sort of structure for dealing with the related tax / property / etc. concerns.

I tend to agree. Customizable contracts would be the best solution. This way we wouldn't straight jacket people into one size fits all marriage. Some people might like marriages where infidelity is grounds for divorce and the cheating party is penalized somehow. Some people might like marriages that have to be renewed every 10 years, to minimize any hassle with any potential divorce or allow a time out on the relationship. ect.

This would make everyone from the traditionalists to those seeking novel arrangements happy.

Comment author: CuSithBell 07 June 2012 06:19:19PM 6 points [-]

I tend to agree. Customizable contracts would be the best solution.

For some reason I'm picturing the Creative Commons licenses.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 June 2012 06:20:14PM *  7 points [-]

I had exactly that as a sort of model in my brain. :)

Comment author: CuSithBell 08 June 2012 03:33:44AM 1 point [-]

I find this quite aesthetically pleasing :D