jaibot comments on Near Concerns About Life Extension - Less Wrong

-9 Post author: Bart119 08 June 2012 07:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: jaibot 08 June 2012 07:54:38PM 8 points [-]

Not too long ago smart phones were pretty rare and very expensive. This becomes less true every year. If Apple had waited until iPhones could be delivered to everyone at a low price, it would have taken much, much longer.

Historically, the way you solve the problems of cost is scale/competition/refinement of production mechanisms/research/application/data/competition (especially when IP restrictions go away). The way you get this is by bringing the thing-you-want-to-be-cheap to market quickly.

Comment author: Bart119 09 June 2012 01:30:58AM 1 point [-]

This applies in some areas, but not others. It might apply in health care if your treatment gives people another 100 years of healthy life all in one fell swoop. But the actual history of medical research is that since the appetite for extra months of life and extra percentage points of cures is unlimited, we see costs rising rather than falling. The cost of a given medication should fall after it goes out of patent protection, for instance, but there is always (so far) some other medication or device that is (at least marginally and allegedly) better. This is the most fundamental problem with the US health care system: patients demand more health care regardless of the price -- a cost they want someone else to bear.