JoshuaZ comments on Conspiracy Theories as Agency Fictions - Less Wrong

30 [deleted] 09 June 2012 03:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (115)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 10 June 2012 04:45:39PM 0 points [-]

Again, in most forms it isn't a conspiracy theory- the people advocating it don't generally argue that there's an overarching conspiracy as much. Some of them do move to the conspiratorial end, but even then they don't approach full blown conspiracy in the sense of deliberate hidden coordination.

Comment author: [deleted] 10 June 2012 04:46:37PM 2 points [-]

I was specifically referencing the Rastafarian conspiracy theory I quoted previously.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 10 June 2012 04:48:53PM 1 point [-]

Ah, yes that would fall into the conspiracy theory outright. There's no question that there are quite a few conspiracies about "whites" as the explicit conspiracy group. I think my confusion in this context stemmed from your use of patriarchy- as far as I'm aware the Rastafarian conspiracy doesn't make any point about patriarchy or heterosexuality, which are relevant in the original context.

Comment author: [deleted] 10 June 2012 04:51:20PM *  2 points [-]

Some Rastafarians maintain that a white racist patriarchy ("Babylon") controls the world in order to oppress the African race.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 10 June 2012 06:36:23PM 0 points [-]

Huh. That's interesting. I've never seen an emphasis on patriarchy in the Rastafarian material I've seen. I'll have to look into that in more detail. The sources that Wikipedia entry give are a dead link and this which doesn't seem to mention a patriarchal aspect as far as I can tell.