Karmakaiser comments on Glenn Beck discusses the Singularity, cites SI researchers - Less Wrong

50 Post author: Brihaspati 12 June 2012 04:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (181)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 06:45:49AM 0 points [-]

"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." Strikes me as just statement statement not over or under (I'm assuming this is your reference?)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 14 June 2012 03:29:11PM 3 points [-]

Atomic bombs aren't much good for destroying one world, let alone worlds in general.

Comment author: faul_sname 06 August 2012 12:57:01AM 0 points [-]

Sure they are. You're not being creative enough if you can't figure out how (hint: they can affect the orbital trajectories of some pretty large objects, which can themselves affect the orbital trajectories of some really big objects).

Comment author: ciphergoth 13 June 2012 06:49:05AM 3 points [-]

No, I'm referring to the fact that before the Trinity test lots of people greatly underestimated what the yield would be. Someone must surely have said "it will be a little bigger than our conventional bombs".

Comment author: Multiheaded 15 June 2012 07:19:16AM 3 points [-]

There's a famous story about Trinity where the scientists all bet on the blast magnitude, and a visiting general made a ridiculously huge prediction, way above what they hoped for, in order to flatter his hosts. He won; the blast was still far more powerful than his seemingly fanciful, signaling-motivated guess but he came the closest.

Comment author: Karmakaiser 13 June 2012 06:59:28AM 0 points [-]

It will go boom and look bright. I dunno what else, I just clear the floors.