As Razib Khan, Tim Tyler and Nick Tarleton explain in the comments, the post is more wrong than right. I seem to vaguely remember that some other posts in the sequences were also shown to be wrong, maybe we should make a list.
Not that we should of course only check the bottom line, but it seems to me that even if the strongest ev psych claims about gender, the strongest race realist claims about race, and the strongest social constructionist claims about culture were all correct, human minds would still occupy a very small portion of mindspace. The moral, then, would seem to be correct: neither our biological nor cultural nor individual histories have shaped our intuitions for dealing with the sort of minds we might be able to create.
Today's post, The Psychological Unity of Humankind was originally published on 24 June 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):
Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).
This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Optimization and the Singularity, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.
Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.