It bothers me that much of the focus on the "high ratios of positive to negative feedback lead to improved performance" hypothesis doesn't seem to even mention, much less rule out, the much more obvious "improved performance leads to higher ratios of positive to negative feedback" explanation for correlations between the two. It seems like it would be quite easy to go overboard if that first interpretation were believed to be more widely true than it actually is...
From the Harvard Business Review, an article entitled: "Can We Reverse The Stanford Prison Experiment?"
By: Greg McKeown
Posted: June 12, 2012
Clicky Link of Awesome! Wheee! Push me!
Summary:
Royal Canadian Mounted Police attempt a program where they hand out "Positive Tickets"
This idea can be applied to Real Life