Ghatanathoah comments on Local Ordinances of Fun - Less Wrong

18 Post author: Alicorn 18 June 2012 03:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (153)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Ghatanathoah 18 June 2012 06:05:22PM *  -1 points [-]

What I had more in mind was a pleasant surprise with these characteristics:

  1. You go do some activity you know you are going to enjoy.
  2. You have planned this activity in advance.
  3. You end up enjoying the activity even more than you anticipated you would.
  4. Your enhanced enjoyment is due to the properties of the activity, not because an someone drugged you or something.

In other words, the pleasant surprise is the strength of your positive emotional reaction to an event, not the event itself. That was the sort of pleasant surprise that I have trouble believing no one would enjoy, and that I would unreservedly not mind an FAI planning for me.

Comment author: Alicorn 18 June 2012 06:06:54PM 2 points [-]

That wouldn't bother me, but it is in no way superior to knowing in advance that I will enjoy the activity the larger amount ahead of time.

Comment author: Ghatanathoah 20 June 2012 10:34:10PM -1 points [-]

It wouldn't be superior for you, but if an FAI, (or just a person trying to live by the principles of Fun Theory) to, is at some point required to simultaneously optimize an environment for both you, and someone who likes pleasant surprises, that would be an effective way to satisfy the other person's desire for pleasant surprises while simultaneously satisfying your desire to never be surprised in certain ways. It would be a good way to fulfill that Principle of Fun without harming any of the people whom it doesn't apply to.