fubarobfusco comments on [SEQ RERUN] The Opposite Sex - Less Wrong

1 Post author: MinibearRex 18 June 2012 04:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 18 June 2012 04:27:11AM 2 points [-]

This doesn't seem to me to be a "sequences" post; it's a response to a particular incident on Overcoming Bias ...

Comment author: komponisto 18 June 2012 01:02:26PM *  4 points [-]

"The Sequences" customarily designates the entire corpus of EY's essays on Overcoming Bias.

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 18 June 2012 04:11:30PM 4 points [-]

I agree with fubarobfusco's usage.

Comment author: MinibearRex 19 June 2012 04:00:51AM 0 points [-]

I was inclined to agree as well, but there was enough connected to the recent discussion of difficulties empathizing with artificial intelligences that I thought it was worth including.

Comment author: maia 18 June 2012 12:45:30PM 0 points [-]

Agreed, and I'm also concerned about the potential for mindkilling in this topic.

Comment author: maia 18 June 2012 02:49:24PM 0 points [-]

Can someone please tell me why this comment was downvoted?

Comment author: evand 18 June 2012 07:18:34PM 5 points [-]

Probably because the original "politics as mindkiller" article is about avoiding non-critical politically charged examples, and says nothing about avoiding any and all political discussion. In fact, it says at the end that it's ok to talk about politically charged subjects.

(Of course, the whole thing is just EY's opinion, and we're certainly allowed to have new norms like "no politics ever". But the original post frequently gets invoked as if it says things that it in fact says the opposite of.)

Comment author: maia 18 June 2012 11:24:36PM 0 points [-]

Fair enough. Thanks for the clarification!