= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Vaniver comments on Ekman Training - Reviews and/or Testing - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (8)
What is the smallest effect size you would be able to reliably detect with a test that small?
Unfortunately I have no idea. My statistics knowledge is many years unused.... I have some brushing up to do.
But it seems you're right - if each person gave 50 statements, the sample size would just be 250 (the # of liers x the number of statements they give).