I'm sure ciphergoth can handle this, but Pandoc is quite well regarded, I believe. There is an online version that someone could quickly experiment with to see how appropriate it is.
(That said, I'm not sure how well it handles LaTeX input.)
I'm sure ciphergoth can handle this, but Pandoc is quite well regarded, I believe. There is an online version that someone could quickly experiment with to see appropriate it is.
Pandoc is what I have looked at so far. The results are impressive but a bunch of difficulties remain.
In our discussion of academic papers, Lukeprog argued that lots of smart people preferred to read ideas in academic paper format. Based on my observations, I mostly disagree. But that's just anecdotal evidence. Let's use Science!
Suppose someone at the Singularity Institute thought up a cool new idea: it could be about rationality, Friendly AI, decision theory, making money, or any of the other topics we discuss here on LW. Explaining it takes about ten pages, and it's nontechnical enough that it can be explained to a general audience of non-mathematicians. Which of the following explanations would you be most likely to actually sit down and read through?
EDIT: To state the obvious, this poll will be biased in favor of blog postings, since it's on a blog. However, I still think it'll provide data that's much better than anecdotal guessing. I've emailed a few rationalist mailing lists to try and counteract this effect.