Dorikka comments on Questions for shminux - Less Wrong

-4 Post author: Thomas 22 June 2012 07:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dorikka 22 June 2012 09:42:13PM 5 points [-]

I think this would be better as a reply to wherever shiminux said that he was happy and qualified to answer such questions, or as a PM to him. As a discussion post, I class it as noise.

Comment author: shminux 22 June 2012 09:58:09PM *  4 points [-]

This reaction is one reason I have personally never made a post like that. While I find the topic fascinating, I can see how many others would not (and the quick downvote supports your point). It is also not directly relevant to the AGI research or to applied rationality. However, I conjecture that there is a significant overlap between the group of people who are interested in Physics and those interested in the subject matter more relevant to LW, so I'm happy to talk about my area of expertise as long as there is enough interest.

Additionally, Physics in particular and natural sciences in general teach us one essential trait for an aspiring rationalist: humility. What's out there and what is possible is so much richer than our imagination, which is a good thing to keep in mind when considering deep and hard problems, like the FAI.

Comment author: DanielVarga 23 June 2012 02:10:54PM 4 points [-]

I am happy to see math and physics puzzles and curiosities on Discussion, if the writeup is good enough. (In this case, it is not.) I am very unhappy to see these "are you smart enough?" gotcha posts that are Thomas' speciality. And calling you out like this was just creepy.

Comment author: shminux 23 June 2012 05:33:35PM 2 points [-]

I am very unhappy to see these "are you smart enough?" gotcha posts

Huh, I did not get that vibe at all.

And calling you out like this was just creepy.

To be fair, he asked me privately first if this is OK.

Comment author: TimS 22 June 2012 11:54:32PM 0 points [-]

Your answer here might the basis of a worthwhile discussion post. Asking the question (particularly because it calls you out specifically) is not a good discussion post.

Comment author: wedrifid 23 June 2012 02:52:00AM -2 points [-]

As a discussion post, I class it as noise.

I class it as somewhere between noise and actual negative signal.