shminux comments on [SEQ RERUN] Is Morality Preference? - Less Wrong

2 Post author: MinibearRex 24 June 2012 04:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 25 June 2012 12:01:42AM -1 points [-]

We would have "true-and-I-can-prove-it" and "true-and-I-can't-prove-it."

The definition of proof is the issue. An instrumentalist requires falsifiable predictions, a realist settles for acceptable logic when no predictions are available.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 25 June 2012 07:24:52AM -2 points [-]

The definition of proof is the issue. An instrumentalist requires falsifiable predictions, a realist settles for acceptable logic when no predictions are available.

A rationalist (in the original sense of the word) would go even further requiring a logical proof, and not accepting a mere prediction as a substitute.