I had not realized there was a faction of "Popperians" around here, and thus went googling to try and figure out who they are/were! My tentative conclusion is that the primary authors with this philosophic starting point who evaporated are "HughRistik" and "curi" who respectively have blogs at Feminist Critics and Fallible Ideas. I drew this conclusion based on a hunt for usage of "fallibilism", arranged chronologically here for the convenience of anyone who wants to see the details...
In Jan 2008 Eliezer wrote But There's Still A Chance, Right? which hits only because of an April 2012 comment by pnrjulius.
In May 2008 Eliezer wrote Science Isn't Strict Enough which hits only because of a May 2008 comment by poke that makes a valuable distinction while summarizing Hume's positions.
In April 2009 HughRistik wrote Heuristic is not a bad word which hits because it is the one and only article under that tag.
In April 2009 (6 days later) Swimmy wrote Awful Austrians which hits because of an April 2009 comment by badger who notes that "Barry Smith tries to inject fallibilism into praxeology in this article (the diagram on the last page is particularly interesting)."
In May 2009 byrnema wrote Dissenting Views which hits due to a May 2009 back and forth with pjeby by HughRistik.
In April 2011 curi wrote two articles one day apart titled Bayesian Epistemology vs Popper and Popperian Decision making. The first actually uses the term, and the second only has comments with it, such as relatively involved comment trees with people like Tetronian, Peteredjones, GuySrinivasan, and Desrtopa.
Edited To Add: Oh interesting... There's Eliezer over on feminist critics offering counter evidence to a theory.
Wow, good job!
Yes, I was referring to curi and BrianScurfield.
Today's post, Where Recursive Justification Hits Bottom was originally published on 08 July 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):
Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).
This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Is Morality Given?, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.
Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.