APMason comments on Real World Solutions to Prisoners' Dilemmas - Less Wrong

31 Post author: Yvain 03 July 2012 03:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (87)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: APMason 03 July 2012 02:48:06PM 9 points [-]

I agree with pretty much everything you've said here, except:

You only cooperate if you expect your opponent to cooperate if he expects you to cooperate ad nauseum.

You don't actually need to continue this chain - if you're playing against any opponent which cooperates iff you cooperate, then you want to cooperate - even if the opponent would also cooperate against someone who cooperated no matter what, so your statement is also true without the "ad nauseum" (provided the opponent would defect if you defected).

Comment author: Grognor 03 July 2012 03:34:44PM 2 points [-]

You're right. I assumed symmetry, which was wrong.