cousin_it comments on Should we be biased? - Less Wrong

-13 Post author: James_Miller 27 April 2009 03:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 27 April 2009 05:11:49PM *  2 points [-]

To explain my downvote: your leap from "pre-formed" to "inaccurate" is too poorly justified. Humans hold many accurate pre-formed (even inborn) opinions, like "being thirsty for a long time is bad for you".

Comment author: byrnema 27 April 2009 05:25:36PM *  0 points [-]

I'm glad you explained the reason for your downvote, because it's easy to argue with.

I was not asserting that "pre-formed" means "inaccurate". I was just explaining that in this context, the University chose the words "pre-formed" to convey this meaning. Don't blame the messenger.

Later edit: If I was saying that "pre-formed" has the same meaning as "inaccurate" then why would I have used the nuanced phrase, "does the work of saying"?