MixedNuts comments on Negative and Positive Selection - Less Wrong

71 Post author: alyssavance 06 July 2012 01:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (262)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 07 July 2012 04:08:00PM *  0 points [-]

But on the opposite side of the spectrum is saying: "Everyone is so smart because they can read and write, and thousand years ago most people couldn't do this!" (Strawman example, I know.)

Generally I would prefer to have a list (tree, directed acyclic graph...?) of all human knowledge, and give everyone a report saying: "This person understands these parts." But over time, the list/tree is growing. Of course it is OK to know a smaller part of total human knowledge, because the population is growing; but still, you need to know more than your ancestors (if your computer skills are the same as your grandma's, then she is a hero and you are a loser); on the other hand some knowledge becomes obsolete.

I think a percentile across the whole country would be a good measure for comparing individual students or schools. And it would be nice to also calculate long-term changes to know whether the country as a whole is improving.

Comment author: MixedNuts 08 July 2012 09:43:25AM 0 points [-]

Boy, are you setting a high bar for Erna Hoover's grandkids.