Alicorn comments on Theism, Wednesday, and Not Being Adopted - Less Wrong

56 Post author: Alicorn 27 April 2009 04:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (320)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MBlume 02 May 2009 07:50:51PM *  3 points [-]

Wouldn't the expectation of bearing children be a bit of a problem there? Mormons are supposed to have (procreative) sex eventually, as I understand it.

Still, it was a mistake on my part to try to hold and defend the proposition "there is no such thing as a well-adjusted Mormon" -- I'm sure they are a few. My point is simply that the belief structure is very widely damaging -- that knowing nothing about Wednesday, the overwhelming probability is that she would be much better off were she free of it.

Comment author: Alicorn 02 May 2009 08:15:07PM 10 points [-]

Yes, they are expected to have kids, but asexuals don't have to be repulsed by sex, it just doesn't interest them in and of itself. The one I mentioned plans to have children naturally if possible and doesn't talk about sex as a horrifying ordeal, just a neutral prerequisite. If she were going to adopt, I'd expect her to talk about the paperwork similarly.

Comment author: frozenchicken 08 August 2010 03:55:15PM 6 points [-]

As a member of the aforementioned subgroup, I endorse this representation. Well said.

Comment author: lessdazed 25 May 2011 06:19:42AM 0 points [-]

Impressed you said so publicly and hope it helps people feel less restrained from "coming out" in general. I would not have been able to do so were I in a position like yours. I was able to recently share something a few orders of magnitude less difficult to talk about.

Comment author: MBlume 02 May 2009 08:55:28PM 1 point [-]

huh, didn't know that, thanks =)