= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
andreacasalotti comments on Interlude for Behavioral Economics - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (49)
Regarding the Dana, Cain and Dawes experiment, the abstract says: "Over two studies, we found that about one third of participants were willing to exit a $10 dictator game and take $9 instead. " One third is less than "the majority of participants" stated by you. A fisherman's tale?
Good catch. I got the numbers out of Art of Strategy, then searched for the study online. Either it's a slightly different study than the one cited in the book with slightly different results, or I'm transmitting an error from there.