= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
RolfAndreassen comments on Value of a Computational Process? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (15)
Well, there you go then: Now we have a standard problem in efficient charity. No new intuitions required.
It's still a problem, in that valuing a computational process remains somewhat bizarre. Questions like whether it's still valuable to run exactly identical copies or rerun the same computation repeatedly from the same state just don't come up with people.