Desrtopa comments on Cultural norms in choice of mate - Less Wrong

-14 [deleted] 10 July 2012 08:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 10 July 2012 10:15:57PM 0 points [-]

Where does this 52% figure come from?

I'm always hearing people attribute numerical majority status to women, but as far as I can find, it's the other way around.

Comment author: othercriteria 10 July 2012 11:04:08PM 2 points [-]

As Brigid's link notes, there's a significant disparity in life expectancy favoring women that apparently more than balances the live birth sex ratio that you cite (at least in the US).

Comment author: Gastogh 11 July 2012 08:01:19AM 0 points [-]

People can mean one of two things when they talk about sex ratios; the first is birth rates, and the second is the number of people that exist at a given moment. In much of the world men have a lifespan several years shorter than women (and lead riskier lives, though that may already be taken into account), which may indeed lead to women being the majority.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 July 2012 08:25:44AM *  4 points [-]

women being the majority

If you count them worldwide, given the selective abortions/infanticides in China I'm not that sure that's the case.

ETA: From Wikipedia: The sex ratio for the entire world population is 101 males to 100 females.

Comment author: Brigid 10 July 2012 10:32:01PM *  0 points [-]

You are correct in that my number was wrong . I think the percentage of males increased (or females decreased) because 52% was the number that was always thrown around when I was in college (I went to a women's college so yes, it was thrown around quite a lot).

My number was about females in the US, not worldwide.