This is the public group instrumental rationality diary for the week of July 9th. It's a place to record and chat about it if you have done, or are actively doing, things like:
- Established a useful new habit
- Obtained new evidence that made you change your mind about some belief
- Decided to behave in a different way in some set of situations
- Optimized some part of a common routine or cached behavior
- Consciously changed your emotions or affect with respect to something
- Consciously pursued new valuable information about something that could make a big difference in your life
- Learned something new about your beliefs, behavior, or life that surprised you
- Tried doing any of the above and failed
Or anything else interesting which you want to share, so that other people can think about it, and perhaps be inspired to take action themselves. Try to include enough details so that everyone can use each other's experiences to learn about what tends to work out, and what doesn't tend to work out.
Thanks to everyone who contributes!
Academian put up a wiki page with links to the prior May and June threads for reference. Good idea, thanks!
In September 2011, I moved away from where I had been living for about eight years. I had been working on various writing projects with a close friend for almost that entire span of time. We both wanted to continue our friendship by some means, and we were mutually dissatisfied with the volume of actual writing we had produced in eight years.
We started a blog with the following rules:
I had to post an entry Tuesdays and Thursdays. My friend had to post Mondays and Wednesdays.
An "entry" is a piece of short fiction in practically any form.
Nobody else is allowed to see any entry of the blog without explicit permission from both of us.
At the start, we had a firm rule that no "negative criticism" would be allowed.
Fail to post on your day and you accumulate a 1000 word "penalty" to be written in the future, on top of your normal writing duties.
I believe that the story of this project has been an important demonstration of instrumental rationality concepts.
I'll briefly describe our results. The highest number of entries posted in a month was 18, which was actually more than the required number of posts in that month. The lowest number of posts in a complete month (before May 2012) was 6, and then the post count for May, June and July of 2012 has been 5, 3, and 0, respectively. All told, our average was 11.1 posts per month, with a total of 111 pieces of short fiction of various forms written in this 10 month period, between the two of us.
Many of these entries were good. Some few of them qualify as the best things either of us had yet written, by some metric. For example, I completed a short story over the course of five consecutive entries - this was the longest piece of fiction I have ever completed. Some single standalone entries were themselves surprisingly powerful. Some entries were "chapters" in a book that we were writing together, and these were generally some of the most fun.
Many of the 111 entries were "churning," or, just getting something down on the page, getting some sticky idea out of our heads to a place where we could play with it, and discover whether it was worth saying anything more about. A few of the entries were baldly "fake" attempts to avoid the 1000 word punishment, and we usually had the good grace to make up for these atrocities on our own recognizance.
We agreed to the "no negative criticism" rule because we were more concerned with being motivated and establishing frequent writing as a habit, than insisting that all our writing be "good" from the start. Furthermore, when you squeeze out a piece of writing in two hours before bed for the purpose of entertaining your friend, you already know it's not very good along some dimensions, you don't need to be told what its flaws are. It's actually much more interesting to discuss what did work, what was interesting about the piece despite its flaws.
Now, I'm not ready to say that we've failed, but we are definitely in a slump, and I'll tell you why. My friend moved away from our former residence recently, and this severely disrupted his habits. He has no Internet access where he is now, for one thing. And when he stopped updating regularly, I stopped updating regularly. I did not decide to do this. I did not rationalize it, there simply "stopped being enough time" for me to fit in writing. Somehow, even on days where I surfed the internet for two hours, there wasn't enough time to write something for the blog.
I think the reason this blog worked so well as a motivational tool are reflected in the reasons why it stopped working. I needed to be able to rely on my friend reading my works, and then giving me positive feedback about the work. And I needed to know that my friend would be disappointed if I didn't post an entry on my assigned day. And I knew that I would feel guilty if my friend was keeping up his end of the project and I was dropping the ball. And I wanted to keep reading his highly entertaining stories, so I was motivated to motivate him with my own stories. And there was probably an element of friendly competition as well. When my friend stopped being able to read and post stories, I stopped wanting to post them!
This blog was a very important part of my life for almost a year. My wife could tell you how dedicated I was to the project for most of its run. It is fascinating to me how my motivation and passion disappeared almost the moment I knew that my partner wasn't going to be able to participate fully.
Thank you for sharing.
I think doing more of the work (writing) as punishment was a wrong move. It carries the notion that work is punishment, which is not what you want, I think.
Is writing easier for you now?