komponisto comments on [SEQ RERUN] Math is Subjunctively Objective - Less Wrong

2 Post author: MinibearRex 12 July 2012 02:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: komponisto 16 July 2012 05:29:05PM 0 points [-]

People naturally tend to confuse the map and the territory, even when thinking directly about the territory. Thinking explicitly about the map requires a second-order map, and that just makes things even harder.

I would consider it a bug.

(Note that I am interpreting your phrase "questions about the 'meaning of math'" in a particular way, as "questions about the physical significance of specific mathematical facts and constructs". I chose this interpretation based on some of your previous comments, which suggested that you weren't yet totally on board with formalism. If, however, you instead meant "questions such as the one whose answer is 'mathematics is the map, physics is the territory'", then those questions are perfectly meaningful, and there is no reason your mind shouldn't consider them such.)