Grognor comments on Verbal Overshadowing and The Art of Rationality - Less Wrong

63 Post author: pangloss 27 April 2009 11:39PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Grognor 25 July 2012 05:25:31AM *  3 points [-]

Both of the studies linked to at the top of this post, on which the entire post is based, have been discredited. Even if they were true, I think it was a stretch to go from those to postulating a generalized verbal overshadowing bias.

With the benefit of hindsight I can say that this post was probably a mistake, which leaves me a bit dumbfounded at its karma score of 61 and endorsement by Newsome. When I scrolled down to the bottom I saw that I had already downvoted it, which made me even more confused.

Comment author: wedrifid 25 July 2012 12:28:55PM *  2 points [-]

Both of the studies linked to at the top of this post, on which the entire post is based, have been discredited.

Where? Was this after the time that the post was written?

Comment author: Will_Newsome 26 October 2012 03:41:00AM 1 point [-]

A smart psychologist notices something about how his mind works. He suspects that it is a fairly universal thing. Unfortunately in modern times that is not nearly enough to get attention. So he does some preliminary research, bla bla, statistical analysis, bla. Then he's like, ha, I was right, and everyone else is like, ha, that's a cool idea.

I don't care about the studies. Empiricism in psychology doesn't actually work. Cf. parapsychology. Studies are social excuses to popularize ideas. Verbal overshadowing is obviously a thing. It's a concept/hypothesis people should know about. Therefore I tacitly endorse posts popularizing it, even though this institution of using shoddy social science studies as excuses is an evil one.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 26 October 2012 12:46:47PM 6 points [-]

Empiricism in psychology doesn't actually work.

Introspection doesn't work too well either. Where does that leave us?

Comment author: Will_Newsome 26 October 2012 06:23:04PM 5 points [-]

(One thing we can do is start with observations like "introspection doesn't work too well" and reason backwards from that to the sorts of mental structures that would give rise to such a failure. That's what e.g. Robin Hanson does.)