AndrewHickey comments on PZ Myers on the Infeasibility of Whole Brain Emulation - Less Wrong

11 Post author: peter_hurford 14 July 2012 06:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (58)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 14 July 2012 11:06:59PM 3 points [-]

Well, when I argued on here last week ( http://lesswrong.com/lw/d80/malthusian_copying_mass_death_of_unhappy/6y2r?context=1#6y2r ) that emulation would be more difficult than people imagine, based on my experience of working on software that does that, people downvoted it and argued "no, people aren't talking about emulation, but about modelling at the molecular level"

Comment author: fubarobfusco 14 July 2012 11:35:35PM *  5 points [-]

Hmm ... from my reading of that conversation, one person said that.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 July 2012 05:38:15PM 3 points [-]

Fair enough, although multiple people downvoted that comment (it seems to have had some upvotes since to compensate). Even if they downvoted for different reasons though, that's still at least one counterexample of someone who fits into the category "folks who expect WBE".

Emulation without simulation would require not only vastly more understanding of the brain and of cell biology than we have now (most of the problems Myers points out would still be there, though not all) but on top of that all the problems you hit when trying to emulate one system on another, plus a whole lot of problems no-one's ever even conceived because no-one's ever ported an algorithm (for which we have neither source code nor documentation) from a piece of meat to silicon.