= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Grognor comments on Eliezer apparently wrong about higgs boson - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (34)
The title of this post tempted me to make another article called "Eliezer apparently right about just about everything else" but I already tried that and it was a bad idea.
Is he right when he says to beware cached thoughts and where he says to beware when confronting new evidence simply repeating one's pre-existing evidence and arguments rather than actually updating?
Have you actually catalogued a comprehensive list of Eliezer's predictions, and which ones have been show correct, wrong, and indecisive?
I once catalogued a comprehensive list of Eliezer's predictions. Here it is.