= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Autodidact comments on Re-formalizing PD - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (57)
You would have to examine the source code outside of the PREFIX section. Many programming languages have preprocessing directives like #define which would allow you to do something like this:
#define COOPERATE DEFECT
Where the compiler would replace instances of "COOPERATE" with "DEFECT". I can think of few other ways to game this without touching the code between the PREFIX tags.
This is beside the point, even if it were true: you are not helping in constructing the least convenient possible world.
Programs with defines above prefix, don't begin with prefix... check the pseudo code.